Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Fernando Centeno's avatar

One problem I see with the data center controversy is the lack of policy context. This issue is treated as an isolated shiny object when in fact, virtually every local and regional govt has an adopted, long-tetm Vision, and, they have an adopted "Strategic" Economic Development plan. How do data centers fit into these plans, if at all?

Bear in mind, bc these data centers are heavily subsidized, create some jobs, and expand the tax base, they are treated as "economic development" (ED)projects. Except that, ED is a derivative of the Community Economic Development paradigm, taken by the commercial real estate industry to subsidize private sector real estate deals -- but these deals DO NOT constitute ED.

ED is a public concept, while business development is a private concept, thus, they are not equivalent terms. Each has its distinct purpose, goals, objectives, metrics, impacts, and outcomes. Concepts do matter, so pls stop equating "economic" with "business" development, and, be sure to define your terms, which hasn't been done by anyone.

No posts

Ready for more?